Material Detail

"Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment" icon

Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment

The article evaluates the effectiveness, safety, patient preference, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of different types of intermittent catheter (IC). Specifically, compared prelubricated catheters (hydrophilic, gel reservoir) and noncoated catheters, as well as their single use versus reuse (multiple use).

Quality

  • User Rating
  • Comments
  • Learning Exercises
  • Bookmark Collections
  • Course ePortfolios
  • Accessibility Info

More about this material

Browse...

Disciplines with similar materials as Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment
People who viewed this also viewed

Comments

Log in to participate in the discussions or sign up if you are not already a MERLOT member.